Chile vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Chile
21.6%
in 2022
Peru
21.1%
in 2022
Chile rank
20th
Peru rank
22nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Chile currently reports 21.6% against 21.1% in Peru, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 20th and Peru ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 25.1% | 22.8% | 2.3% | Chile |
| 2020s | 21.0% | 15.7% | 5.3% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Chile or Peru?
- Chile, at 21.6% against 21.1% in Peru as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Chile and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Chile ranks 20th and Peru ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group