Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Kyrgyzstan
92.0%
in 2020
Mongolia
57.9%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Mongolia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 92.0% against 57.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 34.1%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.6 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79.7% | 29.9% | 49.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 92.0% | 57.9% | 34.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 92.0% against 57.9% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 34.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group