Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Georgia
67.1%
in 2021
South Africa
52.7%
in 2021
Georgia rank
4th
South Africa rank
6th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 67.1% against 52.7% in South Africa, a difference of 14.4%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 59.8% | 48.7% | 11.1% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 59.9% | 54.8% | 5.1% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Georgia or South Africa?
- Georgia, at 67.1% against 52.7% in South Africa as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Georgia and South Africa?
- 14.4%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Georgia ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group