Bolivia vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Bolivia
17.6%
in 2021
El Salvador
18.2%
in 2022
Bolivia rank
22nd
El Salvador rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Bolivia
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 18.2% against 17.6% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 21st of 27 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.1% | 41.2% | 11.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 21.8% | 38.4% | 16.6% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 17.6% | 18.8% | 1.2% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Bolivia or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 18.2% against 17.6% in Bolivia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Bolivia and El Salvador?
- 0.6%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Bolivia and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Bolivia ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 21st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group