Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
95.4%
in 2022
Poland
25,940.4%
in 2019
Armenia rank
2nd
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 25,940.4% against 95.4% in Armenia, a difference of 25,845.0%.
That makes Poland's figure about 272.0 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.6% | 43.2% | 20.4% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 96.4% | 3,741.0% | 3,644.6% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 25,940.4% against 95.4% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Poland?
- 25,845.0%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group