Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
95.4%
in 2022
Mongolia
57.9%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Mongolia rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 95.4% against 57.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 37.5%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.6 times Mongolia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.1% | 13.0% | 46.1% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 84.7% | 30.2% | 54.5% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 110.8% | 57.9% | 52.9% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 95.4% against 57.9% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 37.5%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 5th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group