Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
95.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
92.0%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 95.4% against 92.0% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 94.6% | 86.4% | 8.2% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 110.8% | 92.0% | 18.8% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 95.4% against 92.0% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.4%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group