Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Mongolia
55.6%
in 2020
Viet Nam
65.9%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
7th
Viet Nam rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 65.9% against 55.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 10.3%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.5% | 37.2% | 12.7% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 55.6% | 65.9% | 10.4% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 65.9% against 55.6% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 10.3%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Mongolia ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group