Bolivia vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Bolivia
21.5%
in 2021
El Salvador
21.5%
in 2022
Bolivia rank
20th
El Salvador rank
21st
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Bolivia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 21.5% against 21.5% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was El Salvador ahead.
Bolivia ranks 20th and El Salvador ranks 21st of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.3% | 44.2% | 15.9% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19.5% | 42.2% | 22.6% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 20.7% | 0.8% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Bolivia or El Salvador?
- Bolivia, at 21.5% against 21.5% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Bolivia and El Salvador?
- 0.0%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2021.
- How do Bolivia and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Bolivia ranks 20th and El Salvador ranks 21st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group