Bolivia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Bolivia
22.8%
in 2021
Mongolia
22.1%
in 2020
Bolivia rank
10th
Mongolia rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Bolivia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 22.8% against 22.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.9% | 11.8% | 15.1% | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 24.7% | 19.9% | 4.8% | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 20.7% | 22.1% | 1.4% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Bolivia or Mongolia?
- Bolivia, at 22.8% against 22.1% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Bolivia and Mongolia?
- 0.7%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Bolivia ranks 10th and Mongolia ranks 12th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group