Belarus vs El Salvador: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Belarus
13.4%
in 2019
El Salvador
11.9%
in 2022
Belarus rank
25th
El Salvador rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Belarus
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 13.4% against 11.9% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 25th and El Salvador ranks 28th of 31 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10.1% | 22.6% | 12.5% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 21.5% | 8.2% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Belarus or El Salvador?
- Belarus, at 13.4% against 11.9% in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Belarus and El Salvador?
- 1.5%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Belarus ranks 25th and El Salvador ranks 28th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group