Armenia vs Dominican Republic: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Armenia
27.5%
in 2022
Dominican Republic
25.9%
in 2021
Armenia rank
8th
Dominican Republic rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Armenia
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 27.5% against 25.9% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 8th and Dominican Republic ranks 9th of 31 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.8% | 25.6% | 7.2% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 23.4% | 15.8% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 26.9% | 25.9% | 1.0% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Armenia or Dominican Republic?
- Armenia, at 27.5% against 25.9% in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 1.6%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Dominican Republic?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and Dominican Republic rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Armenia ranks 8th and Dominican Republic ranks 9th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group