Mongolia vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Mongolia
20.1%
in 2020
Uruguay
21.2%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
16th
Uruguay rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 21.2% against 20.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 14th of 30 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.0% | 14.5% | 0.5% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 17.4% | 13.8% | 3.6% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 20.1% | 18.5% | 1.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 21.2% against 20.1% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 1.1%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 14th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group