Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Kyrgyzstan
30.4%
in 2020
Romania
35.9%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Romania rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 35.9% against 30.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Romania ranks 4th of 30 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 49.0% | 33.5% | 15.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 30.4% | 56.0% | 25.6% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
- Romania, at 35.9% against 30.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 5.5%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Romania ranks 4th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group