Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers
Kyrgyzstan
30.2%
in 2020
Romania
39.4%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Romania rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 39.4% against 30.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 9.2%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Romania ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Romania ranks 4th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.0% | 32.5% | 8.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 30.2% | 39.5% | 9.3% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers, Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
- Romania, at 39.4% against 30.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 9.2%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Romania ranks 4th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group