Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Brazil
43.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
45.7%
in 2020
Brazil rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
12th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 45.7% against 43.5% in Brazil, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.0% | 27.8% | 29.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 42.6% | 42.8% | 0.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 47.9% | 45.7% | 2.2% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 45.7% against 43.5% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.2%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Brazil ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 12th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group