Georgia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Georgia
56.2%
in 2021
South Africa
62.4%
in 2021
Georgia rank
8th
South Africa rank
5th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Georgia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 62.4% against 56.2% in Georgia, a difference of 6.2%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 36 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.3% | 63.1% | 15.8% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 55.9% | 59.2% | 3.3% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Georgia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 62.4% against 56.2% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Georgia and South Africa?
- 6.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Georgia ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group