Panama vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Panama
30.8%
in 2023
South Africa
28.3%
in 2021
Panama rank
17th
South Africa rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Panama
- South Africa
How they compare
Panama currently reports 30.8% against 28.3% in South Africa, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Panama ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 20th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.7% | 74.1% | 47.4% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 32.8% | 28.3% | 4.5% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Panama or South Africa?
- Panama, at 30.8% against 28.3% in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Panama and South Africa?
- 2.5%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Panama and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Panama ranks 17th and South Africa ranks 20th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group