Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Kazakhstan
41.8%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
44.8%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 44.8% against 41.8% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.2% | 42.8% | 4.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 45.0% | 44.8% | 0.2% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 44.8% against 41.8% in Kazakhstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.0%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group