Ecuador vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Ecuador
22.3%
in 2022
South Africa
28.3%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
23rd
South Africa rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28.3% against 22.3% in Ecuador, a difference of 6.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 20th of 36 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20.7% | 74.1% | 53.4% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 20.7% | 48.5% | 27.7% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28.3% against 22.3% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd and South Africa ranks 20th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group