Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Chile
36.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
44.8%
in 2020
Chile rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 44.8% against 36.9% in Chile, a difference of 7.9%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.4% | 24.4% | 3.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 44.7% | 26.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 27.1% | 44.8% | 17.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 44.8% against 36.9% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 7.9%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Chile ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group