Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Brazil
47.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
44.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 47.9% against 44.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.0% | 24.4% | 32.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 38.4% | 42.4% | 3.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 61.5% | 44.8% | 16.7% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 47.9% against 44.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Brazil ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group