Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and
Kyrgyzstan
44.8%
in 2020
Uruguay
38.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Uruguay rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 44.8% against 38.5% in Uruguay, a difference of 6.3%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.5% | 43.9% | 1.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 44.8% | 41.5% | 3.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 44.8% against 38.5% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 6.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -all social protection and?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) -All Social Protection and Labor (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group