Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Kazakhstan
50.5%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
48.2%
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
15th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 50.5% against 48.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.8% | 48.3% | 6.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 54.5% | 48.2% | 6.3% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 50.5% against 48.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Kazakhstan ranks 15th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group