Argentina vs Chile: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Argentina
37.8%
in 2022
Chile
38.5%
in 2022
Argentina rank
24th
Chile rank
23rd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Argentina
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 38.5% against 37.8% in Argentina, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 24th and Chile ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.6% | 37.9% | 11.8% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 48.8% | 32.0% | 16.8% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 38.3% | 33.8% | 4.5% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Argentina or Chile?
- Chile, at 38.5% against 37.8% in Argentina as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Argentina and Chile?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Argentina ranks 24th and Chile ranks 23rd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group