Poland vs Romania: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Poland
115.9%
in 2019
Romania
102.0%
in 2021
Poland rank
1st
Romania rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Poland
- Romania
How they compare
Poland currently reports 115.9% against 102.0% in Romania, a difference of 13.9%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 1st and Romania ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.4% | 65.8% | 19.6% | Poland |
| 2010s | 98.8% | 82.7% | 16.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Poland or Romania?
- Poland, at 115.9% against 102.0% in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Poland and Romania?
- 13.9%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Romania rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Poland ranks 1st and Romania ranks 2nd of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group