Mongolia vs Viet Nam: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Mongolia
39.9%
in 2020
Viet Nam
42.7%
in 2020
Mongolia rank
20th
Viet Nam rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Mongolia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 42.7% against 39.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mongolia ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 34 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.5% | 41.6% | 7.1% | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 39.9% | 42.7% | 2.9% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Mongolia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 42.7% against 39.9% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 2.8%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Viet Nam?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Viet Nam rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Mongolia ranks 20th and Viet Nam ranks 18th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group