Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kyrgyzstan
49.2%
in 2020
Uruguay
47.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Uruguay rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 49.2% against 47.9% in Uruguay, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.0% | 49.6% | 0.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 49.2% | 48.1% | 1.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 49.2% against 47.9% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 1.3%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group