Kazakhstan vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kazakhstan
56.9%
in 2021
Turkey
62.3%
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
10th
Turkey rank
8th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kazakhstan
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 62.3% against 56.9% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turkey ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Turkey ranks 8th of 34 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.7% | 52.1% | 37.4% | Turkey |
| 2010s | 44.4% | 55.2% | 10.7% | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kazakhstan or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 62.3% against 56.9% in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kazakhstan and Turkey?
- 5.4%, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Turkey?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Turkey ranks 8th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group