Honduras vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Honduras
47.0%
in 2019
Mongolia
39.9%
in 2020
Honduras rank
17th
Mongolia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Honduras
- Mongolia
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 47.0% against 39.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Honduras ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.7% | 37.4% | 12.6% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 33.5% | 37.1% | 3.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Honduras or Mongolia?
- Honduras, at 47.0% against 39.9% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Honduras and Mongolia?
- 7.1%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mongolia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Honduras and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Honduras ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group