Ecuador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Ecuador
40.6%
in 2022
Mongolia
39.9%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
19th
Mongolia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 40.6% against 39.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.5% | 34.9% | 3.5% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 39.9% | 9.8% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 40.6% against 39.9% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0.7%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group