Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Brazil
50.6%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
49.2%
in 2020
Brazil rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 50.6% against 49.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.9% | 43.1% | 13.8% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 55.7% | 50.0% | 5.7% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 45.5% | 49.2% | 3.7% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Brazil, at 50.6% against 49.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.4%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Brazil ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 14th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group