Argentina vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Argentina
37.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
39.9%
in 2020
Argentina rank
23rd
Mongolia rank
20th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Argentina
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 39.9% against 37.8% in Argentina, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 23rd and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.8% | 34.9% | 13.8% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 38.8% | 39.9% | 1.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Argentina or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 39.9% against 37.8% in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Argentina and Mongolia?
- 2.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Argentina ranks 23rd and Mongolia ranks 20th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group