Panama vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Panama
27.9%
in 2023
South Africa
28.3%
in 2021
Panama rank
29th
South Africa rank
28th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Panama
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 28.3% against 27.9% in Panama, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Panama ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 28th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 35.9% | 86.9% | 51.0% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 30.5% | 28.3% | 2.2% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Panama or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 28.3% against 27.9% in Panama as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Panama and South Africa?
- 0.4%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Panama and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Panama ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 28th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group