Mongolia vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Mongolia
47.5%
in 2020
Peru
48.5%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
18th
Peru rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 48.5% against 47.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 18th and Peru ranks 15th of 31 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.6% | 37.4% | 0.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 37.4% | 50.7% | 13.4% | Peru |
| 2020s | 47.5% | 25.6% | 21.9% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Mongolia or Peru?
- Peru, at 48.5% against 47.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Mongolia ranks 18th and Peru ranks 15th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group