Ecuador vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Ecuador
47.9%
in 2022
Peru
48.5%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
16th
Peru rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 48.5% against 47.9% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Peru ahead.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Peru ranks 15th of 31 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.3% | 31.5% | 2.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 31.1% | 49.4% | 18.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 37.8% | 39.7% | 2.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Ecuador or Peru?
- Peru, at 48.5% against 47.9% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Ecuador and Peru?
- 0.6%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Peru ranks 15th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group