Ecuador vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Ecuador
47.9%
in 2022
Mongolia
47.5%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
16th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 47.9% against 47.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.6% | 37.4% | 5.8% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 33.9% | 47.5% | 13.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Ecuador, at 47.9% against 47.5% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0.4%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group