Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Costa Rica
45.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
47.5%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
21st
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 47.5% against 45.8% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.4% | 37.4% | 5.0% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 54.2% | 47.5% | 6.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 47.5% against 45.8% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 1.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Costa Rica ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group