Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance
Kyrgyzstan
47.1%
in 2020
Mongolia
51.2%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
18th
Mongolia rank
16th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 51.2% against 47.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 45.0% | 38.6% | 6.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 47.1% | 51.2% | 4.1% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 51.2% against 47.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 4.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group