Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance
Chile
16.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
18.9%
in 2020
Chile rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 18.9% against 16.4% in Chile, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.5% | 8.5% | 2.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 8.5% | 14.7% | 6.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 14.8% | 18.9% | 4.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 18.9% against 16.4% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
- Chile ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group