Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance
Chile
21.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
20.2%
in 2020
Chile rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 21.2% against 20.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.9% | 9.7% | 2.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 13.7% | 14.8% | 1.2% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 19.7% | 20.2% | 0.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Chile, at 21.2% against 20.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social assistance?
- Chile ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Assistance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group