Mexico vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Mexico
16.3%
in 2020
Mongolia
18.0%
in 2020
Mexico rank
17th
Mongolia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Mexico
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 18.0% against 16.3% in Mexico, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.4% | 13.9% | 2.4% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 18.0% | 1.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Mexico or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 18.0% against 16.3% in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Mexico and Mongolia?
- 1.7%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Mexico ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group