Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
45.2%
in 2022
Poland
46.8%
in 2019
Armenia rank
4th
Poland rank
2nd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 46.8% against 45.2% in Armenia, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 2nd of 26 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.6% | 21.9% | 10.6% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.8% | 28.5% | 6.4% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 46.8% against 45.2% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Poland?
- 1.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 2nd of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group