Armenia vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
45.2%
in 2022
Belarus
40.5%
in 2019
Armenia rank
4th
Belarus rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 45.2% against 40.5% in Belarus, a difference of 4.7%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 4th and Belarus ranks 7th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.6% | 21.2% | 11.3% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.8% | 48.1% | 13.4% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Belarus?
- Armenia, at 45.2% against 40.5% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Belarus?
- 4.7%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 4th and Belarus ranks 7th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group