Argentina vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
24.7%
in 2022
Kazakhstan
24.2%
in 2021
Argentina rank
10th
Kazakhstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 24.7% against 24.2% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 10th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 26 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.4% | 16.6% | 1.8% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 29.4% | 24.8% | 4.7% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Kazakhstan?
- Argentina, at 24.7% against 24.2% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.5%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Argentina and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group