Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Kazakhstan
24.3%
in 2021
Serbia
37.4%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
9th
Serbia rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 37.4% against 24.3% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 13.1%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 7th of 25 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.4% | 25.3% | 12.0% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 24.3% | 28.8% | 4.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 37.4% against 24.3% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 13.1%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Kazakhstan ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 7th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group