Belarus vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
39.4%
in 2019
Poland
44.7%
in 2019
Belarus rank
6th
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 44.7% against 39.4% in Belarus, a difference of 5.3%.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Belarus ranks 6th and Poland ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.8% | 22.2% | 4.3% | Poland |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 30.3% | 17.8% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Poland?
- Poland, at 44.7% against 39.4% in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Poland?
- 5.3%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Poland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 6th and Poland ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group