Armenia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
45.6%
in 2022
Poland
44.7%
in 2019
Armenia rank
2nd
Poland rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 45.6% against 44.7% in Poland, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.9% | 22.2% | 10.8% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 35.4% | 29.8% | 5.6% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Poland?
- Armenia, at 45.6% against 44.7% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Poland?
- 0.9%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Poland ranks 3rd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group