Argentina vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
24.7%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
21.7%
in 2020
Argentina rank
8th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 24.7% against 21.7% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Argentina ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.6% | 22.5% | 3.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 34.9% | 21.7% | 13.2% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Kyrgyzstan?
- Argentina, at 24.7% against 21.7% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 3.0%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 8th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group