Argentina vs Kazakhstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Argentina
24.7%
in 2022
Kazakhstan
24.3%
in 2021
Argentina rank
8th
Kazakhstan rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Argentina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 24.7% against 24.3% in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 9th of 25 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.4% | 17.2% | 1.2% | Argentina |
| 2020s | 29.4% | 25.3% | 4.2% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Argentina or Kazakhstan?
- Argentina, at 24.7% against 24.3% in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.4%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Argentina and Kazakhstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Argentina ranks 8th and Kazakhstan ranks 9th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group